A classical Chinese edition of the I Ching
易經 · the Book of Changes

The Recursive I Ching

Read a hexagram to know yourself, not to be told your fate — the 64 changes, held as a mirror.

The classical text is public domain — a Zhou-dynasty divination manual, layered over centuries with commentary, popularized in the West through 20th-century translation. This library holds all 64 hexagrams in full, a contemplative reading practice built from them, and a cross-lens synthesis against Human Design gates, zodiac signs, and chakras. A hexagram is a mirror, not a command: read to reflect, never to obey.

Read · the classical text

The 64 Hexagrams

Judgment, Image, and all six changing lines for every hexagram — the flagship reading text.

Compare · one entity, many lenses

Lenses

Cross-read the same hexagram across the collection's grammars, side by side.

Practice · contemplative, not divinatory

The Repair I Ching

Twelve hexagrams read as a repair practice — each one an invitation to find or make an image, not a fortune.

How to hold a hexagram

One faculty, two stances — across three thousand years · tap a node

This library teaches the third stance — and keeps the first two honest, not hidden. The Repair I Ching is built entirely on that stance; the Three Lenses reading holds the tension between them.

The one intention

A mirror, never a command

The I Ching's history is layered: a Zhou-dynasty (c. 1046–256 BCE) divination manual of hexagram and line judgments, overlaid across centuries with commentary (the "Ten Wings"), popularized in the West through 20th-century translation (the lineage this library's 64-hexagram text reads closest to, though its exact chain is undocumented — flagged honestly rather than asserted). Each grammar here is presented in its own terms — the classical judgments as classical judgments, the contemplative practice as a practice, the cross-lens synthesis as one synthesis among possible ones — never as this library's verdict on what a hexagram objectively means.

Where a source's provenance is genuinely uncertain, this library hedges rather than invents: unverified translation lineages are marked as such, and a lens grammar's more speculative claims (Human Design's 1987 origin, for instance) are named plainly as speculative in the grammar's own description. Read the Three Lenses reading →